The Vaccination Industry: Part 1 -– Big Pharma And The Eugenics Agenda
By Sharon Anderson ~ Editor Omegatimes
Vaccines have become a growth industry particularly over the last thirty years and are now a multi – billion dollar business for pharmaceutical companies.
New vaccines are being increasingly added to the National Immunization Programme (NIP) in Australia and schedules in other nations such as USA and New Zealand.
Teenagers and the elderly are now being targeted in an expanded vaccine market.
In fact the long term aim is to vaccinate all age groups.
Vested interests continue to champion the cause of vaccination. The main vested interest groups are the drug companies, doctors and governments. Drug companies, as has already been mentioned, receive huge proceeds from the sale of vaccines and receive research grants from governments to develop additional vaccines.
Doctors are supposed to be trusted impartial practitioners whose responsibility is the care of their patients. However doctors receive monetary incentives from the government to have a high percentage of their patients vaccinated. They often receive free education and gifts (dinners, seminars, holidays etc) from drug companies and receive funding from drug companies to do research. Drug companies also heavily fund medical schools. Political parties also receive funding from drug companies for their election campaigns.
By definition a vaccination is an inoculation with a vaccine in order to protect against a particular disease. Parents are told that vaccination is the only solution to protect their children and are encouraged (at times pressured) to vaccinate their children to prevent disease. The concept of ‘herd immunity’ is promoted – in other words if enough people are vaccinated against a disease there will be no accumulation of disease to catch and the disease will effectively disappear.
However history shows otherwise. Many of the diseases that were prevalent in the 1880’s such as diphtheria had already declined before the introduction of vaccinations. Improved living standards including sanitation, hygiene and less overcrowding as well as healthier diets and advances in medical treatments are credited with lowering death rates and the decline of these infectious diseases.
The eradication of smallpox is given as a shining example of the success of vaccination but the incidence of smallpox actually increased with the use of the vaccine and the biggest epidemic occurred 20 years after vaccination programmes were instituted – between 1942 and 1962 deaths attributed to the smallpox vaccines exceeded deaths from smallpox itself. A 2008 study revealed that 21 days after vaccination the smallpox virus still sheds the disease at the injection site, potentially spreading the disease.
Polio vaccination has had to be shifted to an injection after it was found that the oral polio vaccine actually gave the patients Vaccine Associated Paralytic Poliomyelitis (VAPP). This occurred in Nigeria in 2007 where 69 children developed VAPP. Sadly the oral vaccine is still given to children in poorer countries because it is cheaper than the injection.
By 2008 the NIP schedule in Australia contained 69 vaccine strain viruses and bacteria that a child would receive within their first 18 months of life in 24 vaccines. Today vaccines are made using viruses grown in living tissue and animal blood products. For example viruses for polio vaccines are grown in African green monkey kidney cells whereas Hepatitis B and HPV vaccines are made using genetically modified yeast cells. Foreign proteins, bacteria and viruses may be present during the culture process and thereby contaminate the vaccines and lead to allergic and medical reactions.
Parents are unaware of the ingredients used to make vaccines and do not take the time to read the product inserts that the manufacturer supplies.
Vaccines contain preservatives (to supposedly prevent contamination such as mercury, phenol and antibiotics), adjuvants to aid in eliciting an immune response, such as aluminium, additives to allow the vaccine to flow smoothly such as gelatin, monosodium glutamate/MSG, polysorbate 80, borax, calcium carbonate and xanthan gum and chemicals left over from the manufacturing process such as formaldehyde.
The ingredients such as additives have not been tested for their safety before use and many of these ingredients are known to cause:
- Allergic reactions (MSG, gelatin, antibiotics)
- Neurological damage (aluminium, mercury)
- Cancer ( polysorbate 80), and
- A host of other medical conditions
The product inserts give information on the specific side effects. For example the triple vaccine DTP (Whooping Cough, Diphtheria and Tetanus) has listed side effects of:
- Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD)
- Alzheimer’s Disease, and
Vaccine manufacturers have recently pushed to have death removed as a side effect. In the United States legislation - the Vaccine Injury Act 1990 was put into place as a supportive mechanism for parents to have compensation for injury or death associated with vaccination. If vaccines are so safe why is this necessary? Over 2000 claims have been processed. Sadly in recent times the process has become hostile and an expensive legal exercise for distraught parents with very little chance of success.
Four out of every five cases are now rejected. In a recent decision the Supreme Court has voted to protect big pharmaceutical companies from liability when their vaccines cause injury or death instead of protecting the most vulnerable in society. The Court considers vaccines ‘unavoidably unsafe’ and therefore the manufacturers should be protected.
This decision by the Court arose out of a parents fight for justice – their daughter Hannah Bruesewitz suffers from a severe brain injury, developmental delay and lifelong seizures resulting from the mandated DPT vaccine.
She has been denied compensation from the Court and from the legislation and must now live her life with these debilitating conditions and no support. What a travesty of justice for her, the family and the rest of those young children who also experience these injuries. Australia has no compensation system.
How can we trust that vaccines are safe? Vaccine studies are often underwritten by vaccine manufacturers. The main authors of important studies into the safety and efficacy of a vaccine all too often have a conflict of interest such as being a stockholder or receiving consultant fees, grants or employed to promote vaccines.
Although people would see this as unethical and corrupt, because it is not an independent study, it has become ‘accepted practice’ in the United States condoned by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centre for Disease Control (CDC). Not only are these studies ethically compromised but data that contradicts their desired outcome (i.e. safety of the product) is often hidden in the body of a report but the summary declares the vaccine is safe. For example in a watershed study in 2003 published in Pediatrics, babies who received two or more vaccines containing mercury were found to show signs of neurological damage.
However the authors concluded that there was ‘no significant’ relationship between mercury and neurological damage. This conclusion was reached in the face of numerous studies available worldwide demonstrating that mercury has a damaging effect on brain development and behaviour.
Vaccine makers were quick to respond with data to lessen the fallout. Research into whether a new vaccine is safe most often is fundamentally flawed. Studies into the effects of a vaccine in preparation for marketing a product as ‘safe’ compare vaccinated people to other vaccinated people. Unvaccinated people who would provide a proper control group are not used.
Also the control group is supposed to be given an inert placebo but the placebos given contain aluminium (not an inert substance) to make the vaccine appear safe.
Evidence is increasingly coming to light on the dangers of vaccinations. Data published in the British Medical Journal in 1999 and 2002 linked the Hib vaccine (Haemophilus influenza type b) to rising rates of Type 1 diabetes. The Hepatitis B vaccine has been linked to autoimmune and neurological disorders.
In 1975 Japan ceased vaccinating children
under two years of age for Hepatitis B
and Whooping Cough and their infant
mortality rate began to improve to
being one of the lowest in the world.
Incidences of SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) also decreased. In the United Kingdom between 1970 and 1990 200,000 cases of whooping cough occurred in fully vaccinated children. In 1977 Dr. Jonas Salk the creator of the polio vaccine gave evidence along with other scientists that mass inoculations against polio using the vaccine made with live viruses was the cause of most polio cases in the United States since 1961.
But what is the bigger picture here? For years now there has been a secret agenda amongst some of the most influential and powerful people in the world to reduce the world’s population. Some of them are very open about what they want to achieve. Bill Gates spoke candidly at 2010 TED Conference in California about the world’s population heading towards 9 billion and that through vaccines, healthcare and reproductive health services (abortion and sterilization) population could be lowered by as much as 10 -15 percent.
Bill Gates is a founding member of GAVI – The Global Alliance for Vaccination and Immunization. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is one of the biggest funders of vaccine research and production in the third world.
John P. Holdren White House Science advisor advocated population reduction in his 1977 book Ecoscience.
The United Nations have also been a vehicle for this agenda. During the 1990’s WHO (The World Health Organization) oversaw massive vaccination campaigns particularly in Mexico, Nicaragua and the Philippines. On the surface this appeared to be a humanitarian programme but subsequent facts came to light demonstrating that this was not the case. Tetanus vaccinations were administered but only to women between the ages of 15 – 45. Multiple injections (3 within 3 months) and a total of 5 altogether were given although one shot should last 10 years.
Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin (hCG) was found to be present in the vaccine. Women cannot have hCG antibodies in their system unless it is artificially introduced into their bodies. These antibodies basically render the person infertile as the hormone would not allow the body to maintain a pregnancy. At first WHO denied that hCG was present but in the face of overwhelming evidence admitted to it but downplayed the significance.
It turns out that WHO had been working behind the scenes for twenty years developing an antifertility vaccine using hCG with Tetanus and Diphtheria toxoids as the preferred carriers. The research was also funded by The World Bank, The Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation (known eugenicists). Merck Pharmaceutical Company has set up their own fund and along with the Rockefeller Foundation funded a Council of Foreign Relations policy objective report on depopulation.
Sadly the United Nations and its various agencies are not the humanitarian organizations they purport to be. A eugenicist agenda (reducing the population to acceptable limits and deciding which persons are deemed suitable to live and reproduce) and financial gain are all important.
In June 2010 Deborah Cohen (of the British Medical Journal) and Philip Carter (of the Bureau of Investigative Journalism) wrote a report on the unethical and corrupt process in relation to H1N1 being declared a global pandemic by WHO. It was revealed that the top scientists who convinced WHO to declare a pandemic held close financial ties to the drug companies that profited from the sale of vaccines. Even the Council of Europe declared WHO was guilty of gross negligence and a lack of transparency in this whole saga.
Part 2 will disclose the impact of the introduction of the HPV vaccine (Gardasil) and its effects on teenagers - male and female - with effects including sterility and infertility, and a range of other side effects, including death ... and the resulting attempts to coverup the truth by drug companies and the UN World Health Organization.
Your comments to this article would be most appreciated.